If I were in Manila Penn
January 2, 2008If I were in Manila Penn, I would not have left the hotel. Not unless I had orders from the office or if I knew I would not come out of the whole thing alive.
The debate about the acts of media during the Manila Penn siege has sparked an interesting discussion on the role of media in a crisis situation. Just as media was being arrested in the wake of the police operation, my colleague ABS-CBN reporter George Carino interviewed me on my reaction to the arrests. I said something like it was wrong to arrest journalists because they were just there to do their jobs, that is, to inform the public. I also said the arrests would have sent a chilling effect to media in future similar situations.
After hearing the explanations of the PNP and counter explanations from media executives, and my apologies to officers of the PNP who count me as their friend, I am unconvinced that what I said during George’s interview was wrong.
Did the media have a right to be there and was it right for media to be there? The question seems so basic but I have heard average people ask it. The answer to both is yes. If media wasn’t there, who knows what could have happened? The State would have seen it fit to take shortcuts with persons and their rights, and no one would have been there to tell the world about it.
In a crisis situation, the primary concern of media is to stay for as long as possible, get the story and get it out. How will the truth come out if we leave? Are we to depend on government’s version of the story? As in the case of the Bicutan siege and the assassination of Ninoy, the truth as told by the government gets lost in a chain of truths, half-truths and lies. In the end, it is the call of the journalists, or his or her bosses, whether to stay or go. Then again, a reporter can still argue with his desk on this. I know I would have done that.
To be sure, survival is paramount. No story is worth the life of a reporter and no journalists wants to be caught in the middle of a firefight. I assure you, any media outfit or reporter who pulls out at the first crack of gunfire would be the fool.
Should media police its own ranks and come up with its own rules in a conflict? The only rule is to get the story, get it right and file it immediately.
It is the journalists and his community that should decide whether it should be in the thick of the action, or leave. If laws have been violated because media stayed, it is not for government to assume. Only the courts can decide that.
Unfortunately, public perception is against us. I’ve seen internet forums bashing the media for being hard-headed fools by staying in Manila Penn.
This really shows the basic problem of journalists in this country, that there is a misunderstanding, misappreciation and a snide devaluation of the role of media in Philippine democracy. This is fueled by the oftentimes abusive and corrupt behavior of some newsmen, from taking bribes to arguing with traffic enforcers and even sliding in front of queues. Mediamen have no right to demand special attention just because they are members of media. For the public to respect media, mediamen must act with utmost decorum, even in the most basic situations as a traffic violation.
Much self-assessment is needed not only of how the police and media acted in the Manila Peninsula situation. I am hoping media also reexamines itself, how it acts in a crisis situation and even when the deadlines are over.
But in the end, any negative fallout from the Manila Penn incident should not prevent media from doing its job, or else, democracy fails.
Posted by alcuinpapa